One framework, applied identically across every test

Every entry in the catalogue is produced by the same operators (\(\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{S}, \mathcal{M}, \mathcal{P}, \mathfrak{A}, \mathscr{A}\)), the same thirteen theorems, and the same code in validation/code/. Climate, fluid turbulence, gravitational waves, particle physics, exoplanet transits, seismology, nuclear binding energies, cancer biomarkers, fast radio bursts, KPZ, 3D Ising, Wigner–Dyson, Ricci flow, stochastic homogenisation — none use a domain-specific tuning constant.

Summary

The framework's content is the universal brake principle: every energy transformation between bands has an irreversible component, \(\varepsilon(\omega, t) > 0\). Validation is the empirical record of what that principle and the operators \((\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{S}, \mathcal{M}, \mathcal{P}, \mathfrak{A}, \mathscr{A})\) produce when applied across structurally different shadows. Source: validation/catalogue.md, validation/instances.md, validation/announcement.md.

Catalogue at a glance

30
strong catalogue instances
19
scientific domains
13
theorems (T1–T13)
6
named operators

Three navigational entry points

  • Catalogue — all 30 strong + 3 partial + 3 honest-negative validations, with experiment scripts and results.
  • Data & Outputs — concrete numerical tables: brake exponents, dispersions, R², residual autocorrelations, and the headline results from each instance.
  • Code — the reference implementation: dual.py (forward-mode AD), regression.py (three brake estimators), regimes.py (PELT), decomposition.py (\(\mathcal{P}\)), derivatives.py (multiple \(\rho\)-extraction methods).

Validation by domain (15 domains)

DomainStrong instancesHeadline framework reading
Fluid Dynamics1 (~190 cells across 8 PDE shadows)\(\beta < 1\) in 100% of cascading-nonlinear cells, \(\mathrm{Re} = 10^1\) to \(10^{10}\)
Particle Physics1 (CMS Higgs)Z @ +8.6σ, Higgs @ +2.6σ via bump-hunt
Gravitational Waves3 (GW150914, NANOGrav, sub-threshold)GW150914 @ +23.6σ; \(\gamma = 4.11 \pm 0.39\); GW190426 demoted
Exoplanets1 (TESS WASP-43)WASP-43b period to 0.015% error
Seismology1 (Tohoku 2011)Omori-Utsu \(p = 1.184\), \(R^2 = 0.916\)
Nuclear1 (\(E = mc^2\) AME2020)2,545 isotopes, \(10^{-9}\) consistency
Medical & Pharmacology1 (Wisconsin breast cancer)6/7 literature biomarkers in framework's top 7
Fast Radio Bursts1 (CHIME repeaters)FRB 20180916B 16.33-d period recovered
Pure-Math5 (KPZ, Ising, RMT, Ricci, homogenisation)\(\sigma_{\text{cross}} = 0.004\) (KPZ); 50× Type-I/II gap (Ricci)
Climate15 (CMIP6 + observational + paleo)Anthropogenic vs natural CO\(_2\) at 5.7σ; permafrost at +0.36 K
Number Theory0 strong (Tier-A target)No catalogue instance reported
Fusion0 strong (no catalogue instance)No catalogue instance reported
Epidemiology0 strong (no catalogue instance)No catalogue instance reported
Lattice QCD0 strong (no catalogue instance)No catalogue instance reported
Pharmacology0 strong (no catalogue instance)No catalogue instance reported

Two cleanest cross-shadow universality calls

KPZ universality (1+1D) — instance 11

Three KPZ-class microscopic models (BD, RSOS, Corner Growth/TASEP) at \(L \in \{256, 1024, 2048\}\), 64 realisations per cell. Recovered \(\beta = 0.316\) (target \(1/3\)) with \(\sigma_{\text{cross}} = 0.004\); \(\alpha = 0.505\) (target \(1/2\)) with \(\sigma_{\text{cross}} = 0.025\); \(z = 1.64\) (target \(3/2\)) with \(\sigma_{\text{cross}} = 0.13\). Three structurally different microscopic models agree on universal exponents to <2%.

Wigner–Dyson RMT universality — instance 13

Five entry-distribution shadows (Gaussian, Bernoulli, Uniform, Exponential, Student-t) at \(N = 1000\). \(\beta_G = 0.891, \beta_B = 0.892, \beta_U = 0.901, \beta_E = 0.899, \beta_T = 0.884\). Cross-shadow \(\sigma_{\text{cross}} = 0.006\); within-shadow \(\sigma_{\text{within}} \approx 0.05\)–\(0.12\). Cross-shadow KS distance to Wigner-GOE surmise = 0.0064.